Skip to main content

A resected case of malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor arising in the cervical esophagus

Abstract

We report herein a case of malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor (MPNST), an extremely rare, esophageal malignancy. A 67-year-old, female patient presented with a nodular lesion in the cervical esophagus which was detected on follow-up computed tomography (CT) after surgery for bilateral breast cancer and gastric cancer. Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy revealed a hemispheric, submucosal lesion in the cervicothoracic esophagus. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration cytology revealed spindle-shaped cells with nuclear atypia and positive staining for the S100 protein, a neurogenic marker. Based on clear CT findings of lesion growth over two years, MPNST was diagnosed, and treatment for sarcoma was begun. After one course of preoperative chemotherapy, open resection of the esophagus was performed, revealing a solid, white tumor with a maximum diameter of 1.8 cm. The tumor was histopathologically found to be located within the intrinsic muscularis propria. Based on this finding, low-grade MPNST with a schwannoma-like component at its margins was diagnosed. Approximately 50% of MPNST cases occur against a background of neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) while about 40% occur sporadically, and 10% occur after irradiation. The patient’s history of radiotherapy for left breast cancer may have contributed to the development of the MPNST.

Background

Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor (MPNST) is a rare, malignant spindle cell tumor of the peripheral nerves. We report herein a highly unusual case of a gradually increasing, submucosal tumor in the cervical esophagus occurring within an area irradiated 14 years previously following postoperative radiotherapy for breast cancer. Based on an analysis of a biopsy specimen and the clinical course, MPNST was eventually diagnosed.

Case presentation

A 67-year-old, female patient receiving regular follow-up examinations after breast cancer treatment visited the study center for a close examination after a mass in the left cervical esophagus was detected on computed tomography (CT). When 42 years old, she received a right total mastectomy for breast cancer; at the age of 51 years, she underwent left breast conservation surgery, postoperative radiation therapy (total breast irradiation 50 Gy/25 fr + boost 10 Gy/5 fr), and postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy with Endoxan, Arimidex, and Fluturon. As a reference, Fig. 1 shows a simulated image of the radiation field of left breast cancer in this patient. At the age of 54 years, she received a laparoscopic pyloric gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Her family history was otherwise unremarkable. Blood analysis revealed elevated tumor markers, CA19-9 and CA125, at 116.9 U/mL and 273.5 U/mL, respectively. No other abnormal findings were noted.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Simulated image of the postoperative radiation field of left breast cancer in this patient

Esophagography (Fig. 2) visualized the lesion as a shadow defect protruding into the left wall of the cervical esophagus with a steep rise. Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (Fig. 3) demonstrated an elevated lesion covered by normal mucosa; approximately one-quarter of its circumference was visible in the left wall of the cervicothoracic esophagus 16 cm from the incisors. Ultrasonography found an hypoechoic area with a maximum diameter of 16 mm at the same site. The lesion was located in the intrinsic muscularis propria; its interior was heterogeneous, its margins were irregular, and the boundary between the muscular layer and the perimural tissue was unclear. Fine needle aspiration (FNA) was performed at the same site for diagnosis.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Esophagography findings: The lesion appeared as a shadow defect protruding into the left wall of the cervical esophagus with a steep rise

Fig. 3
figure 3

Upper gastrointestinal endoscopic findings. a An elevated lesion covered by normal mucosa was observed in the left wall of the cervicothoracic esophagus 16 cm from the incisor. Approximately one-quarter of its circumference was visible. b Observation with NBI (narrow-band imaging). c Ultrasonographic findings. A hypoechoic area with a maximum diameter of 16 mm was observed at the same site. The lesion was located in the intrinsic muscularis propria. Its interior was heterogeneous, its margins were irregular, and the boundary between the muscular layer and perimural tissue was unclear (white arrows)

Figure 4 shows the endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) histopathological findings. While the specimen was small and the tissue was highly contused, it clearly contained spindle-shaped cells with nuclear atypia and stained positive for S100 protein, a neurogenic marker. Although it was difficult to determine whether the tumor was benign or malignant, a neurogenic tumor was suspected.

Fig. 4
figure 4

EUS-FNA histopathological findings. a H.E. staining, × 200. Spindle-shaped cells with nuclear atypia were observed despite strong contusion. b Immunohistochemical staining. Neurogenic marker S100 stained positive

Contrast-enhanced CT (Fig. 5) found a 17-mm, internally heterogeneous, nodular lesion with contrast effect on the left cervical esophagus. The lesion clearly increased in diameter over a period of about two years; its maximum diameter in July 2019, December 2020, and May 2021 was 7 mm, 14 mm, and 17 mm, respectively. Positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) (Fig. 6) demonstrated an increase in the standardized uptake value from 3.85 to 4.78 in the same site.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Contrast-enhanced CT findings. An internally heterogeneous, nodular lesion with contrast effect was observed on the left side of the cervical esophagus (white arrow). The maximum diameter of the lesion was a 7 mm in July 2019, b 14 mm in December 2020, and c 17 mm in May 2021, demonstrating rapid growth over about 2 years

Fig. 6
figure 6

PET-CT findings. The maximum standardized uptake value increased from 3.85 to 4.78 at the same site

Based on the imaging findings, which clearly demonstrated tumor enlargement, and the pathological analysis of the biopsy specimen, malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor was diagnosed. After consultation with the Department of Bone and Soft Tissue Oncology, the patient began receiving treatment for sarcoma. After one course of preoperative chemotherapy (AI: doxorubicin, uromithexane, and ifomide), the patient achieved stable disease (SD). Because grade 4 hyponatremia occurred as an adverse effect of the therapy, the chemotherapy was terminated after one course, and the patient elected to undergo surgery.

The patient underwent an open subtotal esophagectomy with a right thoracotomy and an anterior chest wall stem jejunostomy with vascular reconstruction. The tumor was located in the cervicothoracic transition area, requiring the esophagus to be dissected near the esophagogastric junction. The patient was positioned in the supine position, and the abdomen was opened. The esophagus was withdrawn from the neck and was dissected 1 cm cranially from the tumor. Jejunal construction was performed with a pedicled flap. The second jejunal artery was dissected, and the jejunum was elevated in front of the chest wall for reconstruction. A rapid, intraoperative, pathological diagnosis denied any malignancy at the esophageal margin. The operation time was 8 h and 10 min, and the blood loss was 340 mL.

Figure 7 shows the fresh resection specimen. A white, solid tumor with a maximum diameter of 1.8 cm was observed in the cervicothoracic esophagus. The cut surface revealed a uniformly yellowish-white, solid mass centering on the muscularis propria and clearly bordering and compressing the surrounding area. No internal necrosis was found.

Fig. 7
figure 7

Fresh resection specimen. a A white, solid tumor with a 1.8-cm maximum diameter was observed. b The dissected surface was uniform, and no internal necrosis was evident

Histopathological analysis (Fig. 8) found that the tumor was located within the intrinsic muscularis propria. The tumor margins contained a proliferation of spindle-shaped cells and lymphoid cuff suggestive of schwannoma. On the other hand, the tumor center was sarcoma-like, with high cell density and a bundle-like or scattered cellular distribution. The nucleus of the centrally located spindle-shaped cells was spindled to round or mildly atypical with chromatin irregularities; only a few nuclei were large and severely atypical. Mitotic figures showed an increase to 1–2 cells/10 high power field (HPF). Immunohistochemically, the tumor cells stained diffusely positive for S100 protein and SOX10, indicating Schwann cell differentiation, and MIB1-positive cells showed an increase of up to 10% in the tumor center. Based on these features, low-grade MPNST was finally diagnosed.

Fig. 8
figure 8

Histopathological findings. a Hematoxylin–eosin staining, × 100. The tumor was located within the intrinsic muscularis propria and contained a proliferation of spindle-shaped cells and surrounding lymphoid cuff characteristic of schwannoma. b Hematoxylin–eosin staining, × 200. The tumor center revealed increased cell density, mitotic figures, and nuclear atypia. c Immunohistochemical staining. Neurogenic marker S100 was positive

Discussion

MPNST is a malignant spindle cell tumor arising from the peripheral nerves anywhere in the body and accounts for 3–5% of soft tissue sarcoma cases [1]. About half the cases characteristically occur against a background of neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) while about 40% are sporadic, and 10% occur after irradiation [1, 2]. Age at onset is commonly 20–50 years, and the most common sites of onset are the soft tissues of the trunk and extremities [1, 3,4,5]. MPNSTs are highly aggressive tumors characterized by rapid growth with infiltration of surrounding tissue and hematogenous metastases [6].

Surgery is the first-line treatment. For non-infiltrative soft-tissue sarcomas, a surgical margin width greater than 5 mm decreases the risk of local failure regardless of the use of adjuvant radiotherapy [7]. Based on the literature review, the treatment recommendations for MPNST are as complete surgical removal is the strongest predictor of survival, every effort should be made to perform radical tumor excision with as wide a margin of normal tissue as is feasible to achieve free histologic margins [6].

Chemotherapy and radiation therapy may also be used. For chemotherapy, doxorubicin and ifosfamide, the chosen chemotherapy regimen for this tumor, are standard drugs used in the treatment of soft tissue sarcomas [8, 9]. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for localized high-risk soft tissue sarcoma has been tested in several trials, showing a 5% to 10% overall survival (OS) benefit [10,11,12]. Doxorubicin plus ifosfamide regimen should choose whenever neoadjuvant chemotherapy is used in patients with high-risk soft tissue sarcoma [13, 14]. Radiotherapy has not been shown to be effective [15]. In general the prognosis of MPNST is extremely poor, with a 5-year survival rate of 34% and a 10-year survival rate of 23% [3]. Most distant metastases occur within two years, with the most common metastatic organ being the lung, followed by bone [4].

MPNST of esophageal origin is very rare, and to the best of our knowledge, there are only 16, previous case reports (eight in Japan) of MPNST of esophageal origin. We reviewed 17 cases, including the present one (Table 1) [16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25], and found that the age at onset ranged from 27 to 76 years and that female patients (n = 13) were more numerous than male patients (n = 4). The initial symptom was dysphagia in 13 patients; the remaining four patients were asymptomatic, their condition being detected by an imaging examination. The most common site of origin was the lower thoracic esophagus. The tumor diameter ranged from 1.8 cm to 17 cm. Sixteen patients received surgery, and one received chemoradiotherapy. MPNST was diagnosed before treatment in only five patients, but the condition was misdiagnosed as benign leiomyoma in five patients, indicating the difficulty of determining the malignancy status.

Table 1 Previous reports of esophageal MPNST

MPNST often occurs in the context of NF1 as a secondary, malignant transformation of multiple benign neurofibromas throughout the body. The present case was rare and exceptional in that it did not occur against a background of NF1, had weak malignancy, and had a schwannoma-like component in the surrounding tissue. The latest WHO classification of bone and soft tissue tumors (5th edition) [1] clearly defines MPNST occurring in NF1 as intermediate between a benign and malignant tumor. On the other hand, malignant transformation of a schwannoma into MPNST is quite exceptional, and there is as of yet no classification of the borderline areas or much prognostic data. In the present case as well, determining the malignancy status of the lesion by analyzing the biopsy specimen and diagnosing MPNST were difficult. However, the CT findings of the remarkable increase in tumor size over a short period of time, together with the other findings, led conclusively to the diagnosis of MPNST.

The pathomechanism of primary MPNST of the esophagus in the 17 cases reviewed demonstrated no association with NF1 or radiotherapy. Moreover, no evidence of a schwannoma-like component or low-grade MPNST was found. Interestingly, in the present case, the sarcoma developed within an area irradiated 15 years previously for the treatment of left breast cancer. The average latency period of sarcomas is approximately 11 years after irradiation [26]. The pathology of the present case suggests the possibility of a malignant transformation from schwannoma to MPNST, which is extremely rare. The site of the MPNST in the esophagus that occurred in this case and the irradiated area just barely coincide. It may be more likely that irradiation contributed to the malignant transformation of an existing, esophageal schwannoma than that it caused de novo MPNST.

We reported a very rare case of esophageal MPNST which was treated by resection. The diagnosis was based not only on pathological findings, but also on the rapid growth of the lesion over a short period of time.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Abbreviations

MPNST:

Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor

CT:

Computed tomography

NF1:

Neurofibromatosis type 1

FNA:

Fine needle aspiration

EUS-FNA:

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration

PET-CT:

Positron emission tomography-computed tomography

SD:

Stable disease

HPF:

High power field

OS:

Overall survival

References

  1. WHO Classification of Tumours Editorial Board. WHO Classification of Tumours, 5th Edition: Soft Tissue and Bone Tumours. France: IARC Publications; 2020. p. p254-257.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Watson KL, Al Sannaa GA, Kivlin CM, Ingram DR, Landers SM, Roland CL, et al. Patterns of recurrence and survival in sporadic, neurofibromatosis Type 1-associated, and radiation-associated malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors. J Neurosurg. 2017;126(1):319–29.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ducatman BS, Scheithauer BW, Piepgras DG, Reiman HM, Ilstrup DM. Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors. A clinicopathologic study of 120 cases. Cancer. 1986;57:2006–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sordillo PP, Helson L, Hajdu SI, Magill GB, Kosloff C, Golbey RB, et al. Malignant schwannoma–clinical characteristics, survival, and response to therapy. Cancer. 1981;47:2503–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Farid M, Demicco EG, Garcia R, Ahn L, Merola PR, Cioffi A, et al. Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors. Oncologist. 2014;19(2):193–201.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Minovi A, Basten O, Hunter B, Draf W, Bockmühl U. Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors of the head and neck: management of 10 cases and literature review. Head Neck. 2007;29(5):439–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Fujiwara T, Stevenson J, Parry M, Tsuda Y, Kaneuchi Y, Jeys L. The adequacy of resection margin for non-infiltrative soft-tissue sarcomas. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2021;47(2):429–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Mangla A, Yadav U. Leiomyosarcoma. Treasure Island, FL: StatPearls Publishing; 2022.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ratan R, Patel SR. Chemotherapy for soft tissue sarcoma. Cancer. 2016;122(19):2952–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Sarcoma Meta-analysis Collaboration. Adjuvant chemotherapy for localised resectable soft-tissue sarcoma of adults: meta-analysis of individual data. Lancet. 1997;350(9092):1647–54.

  11. Pervaiz N, Colterjohn N, Farrokhyar F, Tozer R, Figueredo A, Ghert M. A systematic meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of adjuvant chemotherapy for localized resectable soft-tissue sarcoma. Cancer. 2008;113(3):573–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Tanaka K, Mizusawa J, Naka N, Kawai A, Katagiri H, Hiruma T, et al. Ten-year follow-up results of perioperative chemotherapy with doxorubicin and ifosfamide for high-grade soft-tissue sarcoma of the extremities: Japan clinical oncology group study JCOG0304. BMC Cancer. 2019;19(1):890.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Gronchi A, Palmerini E, Quagliuolo V, Martin Broto J, Lopez Pousa A, Grignani G, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in high-risk soft tissue sarcomas: final results of a randomized trial from Italian (ISG), Spanish (GEIS), French (FSG), and Polish (PSG) Sarcoma Groups. J Clin Oncol. 2020;38(19):2178–86.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Tanaka K, Machida R, Kawai A, Nakayama R, Tsukushi S, Asanuma K, et al. Perioperative Adriamycin plus ifosfamide vs. gemcitabine plus docetaxel for high-risk soft tissue sarcomas: randomised, phase II/III study JCOG1306. Br J Cancer. 2022;127(8):1487–96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Santoro A, Tursz T, Mouridsen H, Verweij J, Steward W, Somers R, et al. Doxorubicin versus CYVADIC versus doxorubicin plus ifosfamide in first-line treatment of advanced soft tissue sarcomas: a randomized study of the European organization for research and treatment of cancer soft tissue and bone sarcoma group. J Clin Oncol. 1995;13(7):1537–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Iwata H, Kataoka M, Yamakawa Y, Kuwabara Y, Kureyama Y, Masaoka A, et al. Esophageal schwannoma. Ann Thorac Surg. 1993;56:376–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Tomizawa K, Miyazaki T, Yamaguchi A, Honda R, Hoshino M, Yanai M, et al. Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumour of the oesophagus: a case report. Surg Case Rep. 2020;6(1):186.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Manger T, Pross M, Haeckel C, Lippert H. Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor of the esophagus. Dig Surg. 2000;17(6):627–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Murase K, Hino A, Ozeki Y, Karagiri Y, Onitsuka A, Sugie S. Malignant schwannoma of the esophagus with lymph node metastasis: literature review of schwannoma of the esophagus. J Gastroenterol. 2001;36(11):772–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Sánchez A, Mariángel P, Carrasco C, Venturelli A, Vera G. Malignant nerve sheath tumor of the esophagus (malignant esophageal schwannoma). Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2004;27(8):467–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Basoglu A, Celik B, Sengul TA, Yildiz L. Esophageal schwannoma. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006;131(2):492–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Wang S, Zheng J, Ruan Z, Huang H, Yang Z, Zheng J. Long-term survival in a rare case of malignant esophageal schwannoma cured by surgical excision. Ann Thorac Surg. 2011;92(1):357–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Teshima J, Kamei T, Mitamura A, Nakamura T, Satomi S. A case of malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor of the esophagus treated by thoracoscopic esophagectomy. J Jpn Surg Assoc. 2012;73(8):1924–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Mishra B, Madhusudhan KS, Kilambi R, Das P, Pal S, Srivastava DN. Malignant Schwannoma of the esophagus: a rare case report. Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016;49(1):63–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Mavroeidis VK, Kandilaris K, Matthioudakis DI, Kaza SN, Lykoudis PM, Saffioti F. Malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumour of the oesophagus review of the literature and report of a case with lymph node and distant metastases. M. Ann Ital Chir. 2017;88:26–38.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Neuhaus SJ, Pinnock N, Giblin V, Fisher C, Thway K, Thomas JM. Treatment and outcome of radiation-induced soft-tissue sarcomas at a specialist institution. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2009;35(6):654–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Mr. James R Valera for his assistance with editing this manuscript.

The abstract of this paper was presented at the 83rd Annual Meeting of the Japanese Society of Clinical Surgeons (November 2021, Tokyo; Hybrid).

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

EN, AM, KS, KS, HS, and KU engaged in treating the patient. YN and TM performed the histological examination. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Akinori Miura.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All the procedures in this study were done in accordance with the ethical standards of the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments. Informed consent for the publication of the patient’s clinical details and clinical images was obtained from the patient.

Consent for publication

Informed consent for the publication of the patient’s clinical details and clinical images was obtained from the patient.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nakagawa, E., Miura, A., Suzuki, K. et al. A resected case of malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor arising in the cervical esophagus. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Cases 2, 78 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s44215-023-00082-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s44215-023-00082-x

Keywords